Deregulating Innovation Capital: The Effects of the JOBS Act on Biotech Startups

6Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We examine real outcomes for biotech startups going public around the Jumpstart Our Business Startups (JOBS) Act. Reduced compliance costs associate with greater innovation capital formation as biotech IPO volume and proceeds increase after the JOBS Act. Biotechs, which conduct over 30% of IPOs since 2012, go public with products earlier in the FDA approval process and more frequently target rare diseases and cancer. Consistent with our survey evidence that managers use compliance savings to invest in R&D, we link the JOBS Act to post-IPO increases in project-level development, such as new patents, clinical trials, and staffing of laboratories. Post-JOBS Act product candidates are more likely to reach key milestones in the FDA approval process and these startups fail at lower rates. Benefits accrue to shareholders without sacrificing financial reporting quality. Our results demonstrate how tailoring regulations for startups can provide economic and societal benefits.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lewis, C. M., & White, J. T. (2023). Deregulating Innovation Capital: The Effects of the JOBS Act on Biotech Startups. In Review of Corporate Finance Studies (Vol. 12, pp. 240–290). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/rcfs/cfac039

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free