Climate change on the board: navigating directors’ duties

5Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A noteworthy trend within the surge in corporate climate litigation is the increasing focus on personal responsibility of corporate directors. In 2023, ClientEarth commenced a derivative claim against Shell and its directors in the English courts, arguing that those directors were in breach of their directors' duties under the Companies Act 2006. This article analyses the claimant's arguments, examines the basis upon which the court dismissed the claim and identifies the procedural challenges that are likely to be faced by future claimants in commencing similar claims. In light of the rising trend in shareholder activism, coupled with the ever-increasing regulatory requirements to strengthen corporate human rights and environmental performance, the article anticipates further attempts to bring derivative claims against directors for failing to take action to address climate change risks. It provides suggestions for the sorts of arguments that may have greater prospects of succeeding before the English courts.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aristova, E., & Nichols, L. (2024). Climate change on the board: navigating directors’ duties. Journal of Corporate Law Studies, 24(2), 479–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735970.2024.2414466

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free