Reasoning about explanations for negative query answers in DL-lite

63Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In order to meet usability requirements, most logic-based applications provide explana- tion facilities for reasoning services. This holds also for Description Logics, where research has focused on the explanation of both TBox reasoning and, more recently, query answer- ing. Besides explaining the presence of a tuple in a query answer, it is important to explain also why a given tuple is missing. We address the latter problem for instance and conjunc- tive query answering over DL-Lite ontologies by adopting abductive reasoning; that is, we look for additions to the ABox that force a given tuple to be in the result. As reasoning tasks we consider existence and recognition of an explanation, and relevance and necessity of a given assertion for an explanation. We characterize the computational complexity of these problems for arbitrary, subset minimal, and cardinality minimal explanations. © 2013 AI Access Foundation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Calvanese, D., Ortiz, M., Šimkus, M., & Stefanoni, G. (2013). Reasoning about explanations for negative query answers in DL-lite. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 48, 635–669. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.3870

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free