Physicians' strategies for using family history data: Having the data is not the same as using the data

17Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: To identify needs in a clinical decision support tool development by exploring how primary care providers currently collect and use family health history (FHH). Design: Survey questionnaires and semi-structured interviews were administered to a mix of primary and specialty care clinicians within the University of Utah Health system (40 surveys, 12 interviews). Results: Three key themes emerged regarding providers' collection and use of FHH: (1) Strategies for collecting FHH vary by level of effort; (2) Documentation practices extend beyond the electronic health record's dedicated FHH module; and (3) Providers desire feedback from genetic services consultation and are uncertain how to refer patients to genetic services. Conclusion: Study findings highlight the varying degrees of engagement that providers have with collecting FHH. Improving the integration of FHH into workflow, and providing decision support, as well as links and tools to help providers better utilize genetic counseling may improve patient care.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Taber, P., Ghani, P., Schiffman, J. D., Kohlmann, W., Hess, R., Chidambaram, V., … Weir, C. (2020). Physicians’ strategies for using family history data: Having the data is not the same as using the data. JAMIA Open, 3(3), 378–385. https://doi.org/10.1093/JAMIAOPEN/OOAA035

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free