EEG-Based Analysis of Air Traffic Conflict: Investigating Controllers' Situation Awareness, Stress Level and Brain Activity during Conflict Resolution

30Citations
Citations of this article
63Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The effects of air traffic conflict geometry have been well investigated in prior studies, particularly in the context of the pilot, though little in the context of the air traffic control officer (ATCO). No study to date has investigated the effects of conflict geometry on human factors variables of ATCOs through objective and physiological approaches. This study examines the effects of conflict geometries on ATCO situation awareness, stress level and brain activity during conflict resolution. Fifteen participants were instructed to resolve six different conflict geometries: crossing level, crossing non-level, converging level, converging non-level, overtaking level, and overtaking non-level. The results indicate that converging and crossing conflicts led to lower situation awareness (SA), higher stress level, and higher theta activation at the temporal and parietal lobes. Level conflict led to lower SA. The findings offer two implications, providing insights for the formal guidelines in ATC conflict resolution training and provision of inputs for the conflict resolution aid development.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Trapsilawati, F., Herliansyah, M. K., Nugraheni, A. S. A. N. S., Fatikasari, M. P., & Tissamodie, G. (2020). EEG-Based Analysis of Air Traffic Conflict: Investigating Controllers’ Situation Awareness, Stress Level and Brain Activity during Conflict Resolution. Journal of Navigation, 73(3), 678–696. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463319000882

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free