A review of available prosthetic material for abdominal wall repair

29Citations
Citations of this article
78Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Abdominal wall incisional and inguinal hernia repair can call for utilization of implants or prostheses as an alternative to simple suture techniques. The various implants can be synthetic, biologic or mixed: their physicochemical properties condition the mechanical results and the long-term outcome of the repair. The increasing number of available materials allows the surgeon to choose between a wide variety depending on the indication, the site of implantation, the surgical approach and whether the operative field is contaminated or not. With regard to evidence-based medicine, while several synthetic implants have been shown to be superior in efficacy to simple suture, other studies are underway to develop the indications for bioprostheses, in particular in contaminated fields. This review of the literature summarizes the current knowledge on synthetic and biologic implants (physicochemical characteristics, forms, indications).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Poussier, M., Denève, E., Blanc, P., Boulay, E., Bertrand, M., Nedelcu, M., … Nocca, D. (2013). A review of available prosthetic material for abdominal wall repair. Journal of Visceral Surgery, 150(1), 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2012.10.002

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free