Unfractionated versus low-molecular-weight heparin in the treatment of venous thromboembolism

27Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) fractions are prepared from standard unfractionated heparin (UFH) and are thus similar to UFH in many aspects. The main advantages of this new class of antithrombotic agents as compared with UFH are: (1) an improved bioavailability and a prolonged half-life, which alleviate cumbersome laboratory monitoring and may permit one single daily subcutaneous injection; and (2) an improved efficacy-to-safety ratio, with less bleeding despite similar or improved efficacy. For these reasons, LMWH is progressively replacing UFH for preventing postoperative thromboembolism and for treating established deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. However, the effects of the new compounds need to be evaluated carefully in some other indications (arterial thrombosis, unstable angina, or myocardial infarction-the latter also in conjunction with thrombolytic treatment) before they can generally replace UFH in pharmacotherapy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bounameaux, H. (1998). Unfractionated versus low-molecular-weight heparin in the treatment of venous thromboembolism. Vascular Medicine. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1177/1358836x9800300109

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free