Using leverage points to reconsider the sociopolitical drivers of exclusion from education

8Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This article outlines how the international push for inclusive education cannot be aligned with current education systems centred on neoliberal ideals of individualism, measurement, and competition. The way that these systems are organised means that a proportion of (usually marginalised) students are necessarily excluded. In order to meaningfully address the global education crisis, that sees millions of children and young people either out of school or unengaged with learning, this ontological misalignment must be acknowledged, and discourse and engagement around it must be promoted. Drawing from the work of Donella Meadows, I argue that ‘high leverage points’ (information flows, rules, system goals, mindsets) are crucial places to intervene in education systems. Intervention at such points, while challenging, has the potential to lead to transformational and sustainable change; change that current ‘low leverage point’ initiatives fail to produce. I conclude with a call for further discourse and research into an examination of ‘high leverage points’ within education systems, how they interact, and how the development of an associated framework would be beneficial for researchers and development partners.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ingram, R. (2024). Using leverage points to reconsider the sociopolitical drivers of exclusion from education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 56(11), 1077–1087. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2024.2351039

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free