Short- and long-term evolution in our arms race with cancer: Why the war on cancer is winnable

1Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Human society is engaged in an arms race against cancer, which pits one evolutionary process—human cultural evolution as we develop novel cancer therapies—against another evolutionary process—the ability of oncogenic selection operating among cancer cells to select for lineages that are resistant to our therapies. Cancer cells have a powerful ability to evolve resistance over the short term, leading to patient relapse following an initial period of apparent treatment efficacy. However, we are the beneficiaries of a fundamental asymmetry in our arms race against cancer: Whereas our cultural evolution is a long-term and continuous process, resistance evolution in cancer cells operates only over the short term and is discontinuous — all resistance adaptations are lost each time a cancer patient dies. Thus, our cultural adaptations are permanent, whereas cancer's genetic adaptations are ephemeral. Consequently, over the long term, there is good reason to expect that we will emerge as the winners in our war against cancer.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rosenheim, J. A. (2018). Short- and long-term evolution in our arms race with cancer: Why the war on cancer is winnable. Evolutionary Applications, 11(6), 845–852. https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12612

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free