The relevance of fascial surgical repair in the management of pelvic organ prolapse (POP)

0Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the anatomical and functional outcomes and post-operative compliance of fascial surgical repair in the management of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Materials and Methods: The authors analyzed 147 patients before and after surgical treatment for POP analyzing pre- and post-operative symptoms. Patients were divided into two groups: group A patients who underwent vaginal hysterectomy, associated with anterior, posterior, and/or both vaginal repair; group B that underwent only anterior and/or posterior surgical vaginal correction. Results: The average time of post-operative hospitalization was significantly longer in group A than in group B (p = 0.019). However group A showed a better outcome in terms of days after surgery regarding post voiding residual <100 cc (p = 0.039). During follow-up, urinary incontinence improved (p= 0.001), whereas pelvic pressure, regular bowel function, and improvement in sexual activity were not significant (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Currently we do not have a surgical procedure which can be considered the best for treating prolapse, so it seems that the best option is a personalized surgery tailored for each patient.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nobili, F., Lukic, A., Puccica, I., Vitali, M., Schimberni, M., Manzara, F., … Caserta, D. (2017). The relevance of fascial surgical repair in the management of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics and Gynecology, 44(5), 744–748. https://doi.org/10.12891/ceog4001.2017

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free