The fate of augments to treat-type-2 bone defects in revision knee arthroplasty

84Citations
Citations of this article
65Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We report the five-to-ten year results of Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute type-2 bone defects treated with modular metal augments in revision knee surgery. A total of 102 revision knee arthroplasties in patients with type-2 defects treated with augments and stems were prospectively studied. Seven patients (seven knees) had incomplete follow-up and 15 patients (16 knees) died with the arthroplasty in situ. The mean follow-up of the 79 remaining knees was 7 ± 2 years (5 to 11). The presence of non-progressive radiolucent lines around the augment in 14% of knees was not associated with poorer knee scores, the range of movement, survival of the component or the type of insert which was used (p > 0.05). The survival of the components was 92 ± 0.03% at 11 years (95% Cl, 10.3 to 11.2). We recommend the use of modular augmentation devices to treat type-2 defects in revision knee surgery. © 2004 British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Patel, J. V., Masonis, J. L., Guerin, J., Bourne, R. B., & Rorabeck, C. H. (2004). The fate of augments to treat-type-2 bone defects in revision knee arthroplasty. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B, 86(2), 195–199. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.86B2.13564

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free