Hysteroscopic resection of uterine septum improves reproductive performance in women with unexplained infertility

5Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the reproductive outcome aft er hysteroscopic metroplasty in women with a septate uterus, with particular focus on patients suffering from unexplained infertility. Materials and methods: Hysteroscopic septum resection was performed on 181 patients with uterine septa, including 98 patients with infertility and 83 patients with secondary infertility. Patients were placed into 1 of 3 groups: those with unexplained infertility, those who had experienced 1 miscarriage, and those who had experienced 2 or more miscarriages. All were analyzed retrospectively in terms of their reproductive outcome. Results: Aft er undergoing the hysteroscopic septum resection, 43 out of 98 primary infertility patients became pregnant (43.8%). Th is figure was lower than the pregnancy rates for patients who had experienced 1 miscarriage or 2 or more miscarriages, 70.2% and 82.6%, respectively (P < 0.05). In spontaneous pregnancies, the miscarriage rate for those who had experienced 1 previous miscarriage decreased from 88.1% (37/42) to 13.6% (3/22, P < 0.001); for those who had experienced 2 or more previous miscarriages, it decreased from 96.5% (168/174) to 17.1% (7/41, P < 0.001). Th e term delivery rate and live birth rate also rose significantly in all of the groups (P < 0.05). Th e rate of cesarean sections was 28 out of 107 births, or 26.1%. Conclusion: Th e reproductive prognosis for patients with unexplained infertility can be improved significantly by performing hysteroscopic metroplasty. Vaginal delivery is a safe way of giving birth for these patients. © TÜBİTAK.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ayas, S., Gürbüz, A., Tuna, G., Sargin, A. M., Alkan, A., & Eren, S. (2011). Hysteroscopic resection of uterine septum improves reproductive performance in women with unexplained infertility. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 41(4), 595–601. https://doi.org/10.3906/sag-1006-897

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free