Experimental validation of 5 in-silico predicted glioma biomarkers

28Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background. Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a highgrade glioma with poor prognosis. Identification of new biomarkers specific toGBMcould help in disease diagnosis. We have developed and validated a bioinformatics method to predict proteins likely to be suitable as glioma biomarkers via a global microarray meta-analysis to identify uncharacterized genes consistently coexpressed with known glioma-associated genes. Methods. A novel bioinformatics method was implemented called global microarray meta-analysis, using ~16 000microarrayexperiments to identify uncharacterized genes consistently coexpressed with known gliomaassociated genes. These novel biomarkers were validated as proteins highly expressed in human gliomas varying in tumor grades using immunohistochemistry.Glioma gene databases were used to assess delineation of expression of these markers in varying glioma grades and subtypes of GBM. Results. We have identified 5 potential biomarkers-spondin1, Plexin-B2, SLIT3, fibulin-1, and LINGO1-that were validated as proteins highly expressed on the surface of human gliomas using immunohistochemistry. Expression of spondin1, Plexin-B2, and SLIT3 was significantly higher (P < .01) in high-grade gliomas than in low-grade gliomas. These biomarkers were significant discriminators in grade IV gliomas compared with either grade III or II tumors and also distinguished between GBM subclasses.Conclusions. This study strongly suggests that this type of bioinformatics approach has high translational potential to rapidly discernwhich poorly characterizedproteins may be of clinical relevance. © The Author(s) 2013.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Towner, R. A., Jensen, R. L., Vaillant, B., Colman, H., Saunders, D., Giles, C. B., & Wren, J. D. (2013). Experimental validation of 5 in-silico predicted glioma biomarkers. Neuro-Oncology, 15(12), 1625–1634. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/not124

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free