Knowledge-based representation: Patient engagement in drug development

2Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: Recently, different actors have intensified their efforts to make drug development more participatory. They have produced many frameworks, tools and dedicated fora, where patients are portrayed as relevant stakeholders to be involved throughout the entire drug development trajectory. To better understand what such participatory efforts entail, in this article, we investigate how patient representation is configured in drug development and what patients can engage as representatives in this field. Methods: This is a qualitative study based on the thematic analysis of 40 semistructured interviews with different stakeholders in the field and three patient engagement How-To guides (HTGs) complemented by observations of two sessions of the Patient Engagement Open Forum (PEOF) and a patient expert training of the European Patients' Academy on Therapeutic Innovation (EUPATI). Findings: The emerging practices of patient engagement in drug development configure representation as hinging upon three types of knowledge—drug development knowledge, autobiographical knowledge and community knowledge—and a specific set of skills. We discern a new kind of representation based on these findings, termed ‘knowledge-based representation’, which appears to more accurately describe how patients are expected to represent others in drug development. Conclusion: Even though knowledge-based representation may be understood as an attempt to downplay the political aspects of representation in favour of its epistemic elements, the political processes involved in patient representation in drug development cannot be ignored. The extent to which reliance on knowledge-based representation will contribute to democratic decision-making is likely to depend on the resources needed to develop the types of knowledge relevant to representation work and on how these types of knowledge are determined. Patient or Public Contribution: Patient representatives and practitioners in the field of patient engagement (including 13 interviewees, representatives of EUPATI and HTG developers) gave feedback on the interpretation of the findings during a multistakeholder workshop we organised. We also sent an interviewee an extended draft and discussed it during an online meeting. Claudia Egher presented these findings at a PEOF session in June 2023, which further contributed to their validation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Egher, C., & Zvonareva, O. (2024). Knowledge-based representation: Patient engagement in drug development. Health Expectations, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13912

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free