Determination of 232Th and 230Th in seawater using a chemical separation procedure and thermal ionization mass spectrometry

9Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A method for the determination of 232Th and 230Th in seawater has been developed by substantial modifications of available techniques mainly used for other matrixes. We use a well calibrated 229Th spike and iron oxyhydroxides as a carrier phase for the precipitation of Th from about 3.5 L filtered seawater. The chemical separation and purification of Th from the Fe carrier comprise three ion chromatography steps including AG 1-x8 (200-400 mesh, Cl- form), TRU Resin, and UTEVA Resin. The separated Th fraction is loaded with a mixture of graphite/phosphoric acid onto zone-refined single rhenium filaments. These are analyzed in peak-jumping mode on a thermal ionization mass spectrometer. Due to the low Th concentration in seawater, the 232Th blank constitute a significant problem for the chemical separation of Th from the seawater matrix and also for the filament loading. By applying a detailed cleaning scheme including a HF-HCl mixture, the total procedural blank could be substantially reduced to approximately 0.4 pg. This is generally < 1% of a typical 232Th concentration in surface seawater, which ranges from about 0.01 to 1 picomol/kg. The analysis of standards, artificial seawater, and a series of seawater samples obtained from the GEOTRACES intercalibration cruises in 2008 and 2009 demonstrate that this method can yield a precision for 232Th concentration in seawater of about 1% to 2% (2s) and 230Th concentration of about 2% to 5% (2σ). © 2012, by the American Society of Limnology and Oceanography, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Andersson, P. S., & Schöberg, H. (2012). Determination of 232Th and 230Th in seawater using a chemical separation procedure and thermal ionization mass spectrometry. Limnology and Oceanography: Methods, 10(MAY), 296–303. https://doi.org/10.4319/lom.2012.10.296

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free