Factors affecting survival from avalanche burial-A randomised prospective porcine pilot study

40Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background and aim: The majority of avalanche victims who sustain complete burial die within 35. min due to asphyxia and injuries. After 35. min, survival is possible only in the presence of a patent airway, and an accompanying air pocket around the face may improve survival. At this stage hypothermia is assumed to be an important factor for survival because rapid cooling decreases oxygen consumption; if deep hypothermia develops before cardiac arrest, hypothermia may be protective and prolong the time that cardiac arrest can be survived. The aim of the study was to investigate the combined effects of hypoxia, hypercapnia and hypothermia in a porcine model of avalanche burial. Methods: Eight piglets were anaesthetised, intubated and buried under snow, randomly assigned to an air pocket (. n=. 5) or ambient air (. n=. 3) group. Results: Mean cooling rates in the first 10min of burial were -19.7±4.7°Ch-1 in the air pocket group and -13.0±4.4°Ch-1 in the ambient air group (P=0.095); overall cooling rates between baseline and asystole were -4.7±1.4°Ch-1 and -4.6±0.2°Ch-1 (P=0.855), respectively. In the air pocket group cardiac output (P=0.002), arterial oxygen partial pressure (P=0.001), arterial pH (P=0.002) and time to asystole (P=0.025) were lower, while arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure (P=0.007) and serum potassium (P=0.042) were higher compared to the ambient air group. Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that hypothermia may develop in the early phase of avalanche burial and severe asphyxia may occur even in the presence of an air pocket. © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Paal, P., Strapazzon, G., Braun, P., Ellmauer, P. P., Schroeder, D. C., Sumann, G., … Brugger, H. (2013). Factors affecting survival from avalanche burial-A randomised prospective porcine pilot study. Resuscitation, 84(2), 239–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.06.019

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free