Screening Automation in Systematic Reviews: Analysis of Tools and Their Machine Learning Capabilities

1Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Systematic reviews provide robust evidence but require significant human labor, a challenge that can be mitigated with digital tools. This paper focuses on machine learning (ML) support for the title and abstract screening phase, the most time-intensive aspect of the systematic review process. The existing literature was systematically reviewed and five promising tools were analyzed, focusing on their ability to reduce human workload and their application of ML. This paper details the current state of automation capabilities and highlights significant research findings that point towards further improvements in the field. Directions for future research in this evolving field are outlined, with an emphasis on the need for a cautious application of existing systems.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sandner, E., Gütl, C., Jakovljevic, I., & Wagner, A. (2024). Screening Automation in Systematic Reviews: Analysis of Tools and Their Machine Learning Capabilities. In Studies in Health Technology and Informatics (Vol. 313, pp. 179–185). IOS Press BV. https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI240034

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free