Delays in Follow-up Care for Abnormal Mammograms in Mobile Mammography Versus Fixed-Clinic Patients

8Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Mobile mammographic services (MM) have been shown to increase breast cancer screening in medically underserved women. However, little is known about MM patients’ adherence to follow-up of abnormal mammograms and how this compares with patients from traditional, fixed clinics. Objectives: To assess delays in follow-up of abnormal mammograms in women screened using MM versus fixed clinics. Design: Electronic medical record review of abnormal screening mammograms. Subjects: Women screened on a MM van or at a fixed clinic with an abnormal radiographic result in 2019 (N = 1,337). Main Measures: Our outcome was delay in follow-up of an abnormal mammogram of 60 days or greater. Guided by Andersen’s Behavioral Model of Health Services Utilization, we assessed the following: predisposing (age, ethnicity, marital status, preferred language), enabling (insurance, provider referral, clinic site), and need (personal breast cancer history, family history of breast/ovarian cancer) factors. Key Results: Only 45% of MM patients had obtained recommended follow-up within 60 days of an abnormal screening compared to 72% of fixed-site patients (p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vang, S. S., Dunn, A., Margolies, L. R., & Jandorf, L. (2022). Delays in Follow-up Care for Abnormal Mammograms in Mobile Mammography Versus Fixed-Clinic Patients. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 37(7), 1619–1625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-07189-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free