Advancing the cause? Contributions of criteria and indicators to sustainable forest management in Canada1

4Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to take stock, based on my personal scholarly and practical experiences, of the progress made in Canada with criteria and indicators of sustainable forest management (C&I-SFM). Some developmental history is reviewed, and applications at national and local levels are summarized. In my opinion, Canada's work in developing and applying C&I-SFM has been beneficial, particularly in focussing forest-sector dialogues, in sensitizing people to the wide range of forest values, and in retrospective determinations of progress in SFM. Improvements over the next decade are needed in several areas: (a) improving data-collection programs; (b) linking C&I-SFM more directly into forest policy development; (c) shifting from retrospective to prospective sustainability analysis; and (d) applying C&I-SFM to nonindustrial forests such as protected areas and urban forests. The C&I-SFM concept is sound. We have yet to tap its full potential in the pursuit of forest and forest-sector sustainability.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Duinker, P. N. (2011). Advancing the cause? Contributions of criteria and indicators to sustainable forest management in Canada1. Forestry Chronicle, 87(4), 488–493. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc2011-047

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free