Comparison of fluorinated polymers against stainless steel, glass and polypropylene in microbial biofilm adherence and removal

72Citations
Citations of this article
72Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Biofilm formation is a long-standing problem in ultrapure water and bioprocess fluid transport lines. The standard materials used in these applications (316L stainless steel, polypropylene and glass) have long been known to be good surfaces for the attachment of bacteria and other biological materials. To compare the relative tenacity of biofilms grown on materials used in manufacturing processes, a model system for biofilm attachment was constructed that approximates the conditions in industrial process systems. New fluorinated polymers were compared to the above materials by evaluating the surface area coverage of bacterial populations on materials before and after mild chemical treatment. In addition, contact angle studies compared the relative hydrophobicity of surfaces to suspensions of bacteria in growth media, and scanning electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy studies were used to characterize surface smoothness and surface defects. Biofilm adherence to polymer-based substrata was determined to be a function of both surface finish and surface chemistry. Specifically, materials that are less chemically reactive, as indicated by higher contact angle, can have rougher surface finishes and still be amenable to biofilm removal.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hyde, F. W., Alberg, M., & Smith, K. (1997). Comparison of fluorinated polymers against stainless steel, glass and polypropylene in microbial biofilm adherence and removal. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology, 19(2), 142–149. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jim.2900448

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free