Abstract
Three different routes were probed for the synthesis of enantiomerically enriched 2-(1-aminoethyl)phenols and their methyl ethers. The first route centers on diastereoselective nucleophile addition to chiral imines. The second route has as key steps the enantioselective reduction of a ketone followed by nucleophilic substitution, and the third route involves a diastereoselective imine reduction. The efficiency of the approach depends on the substrate substitution pattern. All three methods work well for the parent compound 2-(1-aminoethyl)phenol (1) but the third route is the most efficient, providing the compound with >96% enantiomer excess in three steps with an overall yield of 71%. Conversely, for the ortho-methyl analogue 2, the first method is best. For the t-Bu-substituted analogue 3, only moderate enantiomeric enrichment was achieved.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Kündig, E. P., Botuha, C., Lemercier, G., Romanens, P., Saudan, L., & Thibault, S. (2004). Asymmetric Syntheses of 2-(1-Aminoethyl)phenols. Helvetica Chimica Acta, 87(3), 561–579. https://doi.org/10.1002/hlca.200490054
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.