Informal civil-military relations in Latin America: Why politicians and soldiers choose unofficial venues

30Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This study examines the phenomenon of informal civil-military relations. Informal behaviors are those that normally do not occur within the chain of command, are not mandated by law, and do not conform to official procedures. Politicians and soldiers discover that formal, institutional routines are sometimes too constraining and that they can advance their interests more effectively by amending, circumventing, or violating those routines. The party most aggrieved by the rules of the game initiates an informal solution. Whether the other side goes along depends on how divergent its preferences are with the aggrieved party. Greatly divergent preferences result in unilateral informalities, less divergent but still negotiable positions yield bilateralconflictive encounters, and convergent preferences result in cooperative ventures. Case studies on Chile, Argentina, and Bolivia exemplify three different kinds of informal encounters and their impacts on civilian policy choices and military interests. © 2010 Inter-University.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pion-Berlin, D. (2010). Informal civil-military relations in Latin America: Why politicians and soldiers choose unofficial venues. Armed Forces and Society, 36(3), 526–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X09352961

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free