TREE STAND ASSESSMENT BEFORE AND AFTER WINDTHROW BASED ON OPEN-ACCESS BIODIVERSITY DATA AND AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY

Abstract

The ground-based surveys of areas affected by storms might be difficult or even impossible because of the limited ability to move within the damaged area. Therefore, this work was aimed to estimate storm damage based on aerial photography and open biodiversity data available via the Internet. The study was carried out in the old-growth hemiboreal forests of the Kologrivsky Forest State Nature Reserve (Kostroma Region, Russia), which was affected by a catastrophic windthrow caused by a storm on 15.05.2021. The sampling area was 100 000 m2. We used our previous ground-survey studies and open-access biodiversity data available through the Global Biodiversity Information Facility for describing the forest stands composition before the catastrophic event. The aerial photography data were used for estimating tree stands damages after the windthrow. For remote data collecting, we used an unmanned aerial vehicle – quadrocopter DJI Phantom 4. Agisoft Metashape software was used for aerial photographs processing. The obtained photogrammetric digital elevation model (DEM) and orthophoto-mosaic were processed with QGIS software. Damaged areas were detected automatically based on the DEM. Individual fallen trees were visually detected using the orthophoto-mosaic. We found before the windthrow the study area was covered by old-growth stands developed naturally over a long time. The stand structure was multi-layered and uneven-aged. The ontogenetic spectra of late-successional tree species Picea abies (hereinafter – spruce) and Tilia cordata (hereinafter – linden) were normal. The old-growth stands were heterogeneous before the windthrow: the canopy closed multi-layered and uneven-aged stands, decaying spruce stands and areas where spruce completely fell out and the tree stand was absent. In addition, old-growth linden stands were present. According to the obtained results, the stand structure was critically changed caused by the windthrow. The DEM-processing results showed the windthrow strongly damaged 33.1% stands in the study area. Using the orthophoto-mosaic, we visually detected 759 fallen trees. Among them, 82.9% were associated with strongly-damaged areas. According to the DEM classification, the rest of the visually detected fallen trees were in non-damaged areas and canopy gaps established before the windthrow. The analysis showed that these were less damaged areas with survived stands or groups of trees after the storm. Thus, our results showed that it is necessary to use both the DEM and the orthophoto-mosaic for more accurate estimates. Our exploratory analysis of different tree stand damages found that apparently, spruce stands were more affected by the storm than linden stands. It is explained by the different wind resistance of spruce and linden and differences in regrowth density and species composition in these stands.