Abstract
This study evaluates the sensory comfort of eco-friendly textiles, comparing natural (bamboo, organic cotton, hemp, jute, soya bean protein fibers), regenerated (Tencel (lyocell)), and synthetic (recycled polyester, recycled nylon) fibers for sustainable apparel applications. Through a comprehensive analysis, we quantify thermal, moisture, and tactile properties, revealing significant performance differences. Bamboo (thermal conductivity 0.049 W/m·K, air permeability 695 mm/s) excels in cooling and breathability, while hemp (0.022 W/m·K, thermal resistance 22.0 × 10−3 m2 ·K/W) offers superior insulation. Recycled polyester (1635 mm/s, moisture regains 0.4%) outperforms natural fibers in breathability but lags in moisture absorption compared to bamboo (13.0%) and Tencel (lyocell) (11.0%). Tencel (lyocell) and soya bean protein fibers provide smooth tactile comfort (friction 0.2–0.3), unlike coarser hemp (0.45). Emerging technologies like electrospinning enhance bamboo’s air permeability by 30% (~900 mm/s), while machine learning optimizes cotton blends for 15–20% better moisture management. Synthetic fibers’ low biodegradability (20–200 years vs. bamboo’s 1–2 years) poses environmental trade-offs. These metrics guide industry decisions, favoring bamboo and Tencel (lyocell) for moisture-absorbing apparel, hemp for insulation, and polyester for activewear, balancing comfort and sustainability.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Iftikhar, F., Anjum, A. S., Choudry, Z., Zahid, A., Khan, M. Q., Nawaz, H. H., & Umar, M. (2026). Comparative Assessment of Sensory Comfort Properties Across Eco-Friendly Textile Materials for Apparel. Journal of Natural Fibers. Taylor and Francis Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2025.2608721
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.