Pedometry to prevent cardiorespiratory fitness decline-is it effective?

7Citations
Citations of this article
103Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Introduction: Physically active providers are more likely to prescribe exercise. Unfortunately, many become sedentary during their training. We examined pedometry as an incentive to promote physical activity in a cohort of medical students. Methods: This was a prospective, unblinded clinical trial of pedometry. 107 preclinical medical students volunteered. 50 students received Fitbit pedometers and 57 served as controls. All students ran 1.5- or 2-mile timed runs before pedometer issue, and again 1 year after. Change in run times were the primary outcome measure. Step counts, body composition, and exercise frequency were secondary outcomes. Results: 76% of students with pedometers reported increased motivation to exercise and 57% reported changing daily routines as a result of pedometry. Active pedometry participants declined from 48/50 initially to 22/50 over 13 months. Run times slowed an average of 5.0 seconds for pedometry users vs. 12.3 seconds for the control group. This difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.48). Conclusions: A subset of future physicians reported increased motivation to exercise after a trial of pedometry. However, adherence over the long term was poor and it seems to have a limited impact on aerobic exercise performance in this population.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lystrup, R. M., West, G. F., Olsen, C., Ward, M., & Stephens, M. B. (2016). Pedometry to prevent cardiorespiratory fitness decline-is it effective? Military Medicine, 181(10), 1235–1239. https://doi.org/10.7205/MILMED-D-15-00540

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free