The article presents some tools for the realization of history through archeology, genealogy and cartography with Foucault, Deleuze and Veyne. Working with documents and files from the perspective of the subjectivity production of the story is relevant to research in psychology. The text aims indeed propose general procedures on historical studies and point out some recommendations to those who want to manage sources, present in public and private archives. The historical writing permeates important concepts to the criticism of the naturalization of social practices and thus lets you operate spaces of freedom which seemed to be evidence. Foucault was named, so the evidence destroyer as outlined hammered from Nietzsche of petrified layers of knowledge, power and subjectivity, which make up governance arrangements of pipelines, at present. Thus, it is possible to analyze the historical events in the game, and in a mobile field of heterogeneous forces. The history of truth is a questioning which enables denature the knowledge, power and move move subjectivities. Historicizing is to create cracks and other spaces.
CITATION STYLE
Lemos, F. C. S., Galindo, D., & de Oliveira, P. de T. R. (2016). História, subjetividade e arquivos em Michel Foucault, Paul Veyne e Gilles Deleuze. Psicologia Em Estudo, 21(1), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.4025/psicolestud.v21i1.29945
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.