An evaluation of instrument types for mass spectrometry-based multi-attribute analysis of biotherapeutics

29Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Multi-attribute methods (MAM), based on proteolytic digestion followed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of proteolytic peptides, have gained substantial attention in the biopharmaceutical industry for quantifying a variety of quality attributes for therapeutic proteins. Most MAM developed so far have been based on high-resolution mass spectrometers, due to their superb resolving power to distinguish analyte signals from interferences. Lower-resolution instruments, if demonstrated suitable, may further promote the adoption of the technology due to their low cost, small footprint, and ease of use. In this work, we compared the performance of a high-resolution instrument with a few low-resolution quadrupole-type instruments in quantifying a diverse set of quality attributes in a monoclonal antibody product. Different modes of operation for the quadrupole instruments, including scan mode, selected-ion monitoring and multiple-reaction monitoring, were evaluated. The high-resolution instrument has superb performance, with a quantitation limit of 0.002%. Single-quadrupole instruments in scan mode, on the other hand, provide a quantitation limit of about 1%, which may be fit-for-purpose for many routine MAM applications.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhang, Z., Chan, P. K., Richardson, J., & Shah, B. (2020). An evaluation of instrument types for mass spectrometry-based multi-attribute analysis of biotherapeutics. MAbs, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/19420862.2020.1783062

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free