Pharmacodynamics of nine generic products of amikacin compared with the innovator in the neutropenic mouse thigh infection model

2Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Previously, we validated the mouse thigh infection model to test the therapeutic equivalence of generic antibiotic products. Here, our aim was to compare the in vivo efficacy of amikacin products in clinical use in Colombia using this animal model. Results: All except one generic product had the same in vitro potency, judging by the lack of differences on MIC and MBC compared with the innovator. However, eight of nine generic products failed in the neutropenic mouse thigh infection model to achieve the innovator's maximum effect (E max ≤ 5.65 for the generics vs. 6.58 log10 CFU/g for the innovator) against Escherichia coli SIG-1, after subcutaneous treatment every 6 h with doses ranging from 1.5 to 3072 mg/kg per day. Conclusion: As we demonstrated previously with other antibiotics such as vancomycin, gentamicin and oxacillin, the generic products of amikacin failed the in vivo efficacy testing. The therapeutic equivalence should be assessed in vivo before clinical approval of generic products.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zuluaga, A. F., Rodriguez, C. A., Agudelo, M., & Vesga, O. (2015). Pharmacodynamics of nine generic products of amikacin compared with the innovator in the neutropenic mouse thigh infection model. BMC Research Notes, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1507-z

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free