Comparing the accuracy of 3D slicer software in printed enduse parts

33Citations
Citations of this article
101Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This study aims to compare the accuracy offered by 3D Slicer Software in printing end-use parts inside a Fused Deposition Modeling process of Additive Manufacturing. The purpose, in particular, is to investigate the surface quality and the dimensional stability of the manufactured parts comparing the effect of selecting a different 3D Slicer tool among Simplify3D, Cura and Slic3r 3D. With this scope, parts were produced using these process tools while results were analysed in terms of accuracy, production time and consumption of material. Results, graphically and visually presented, show significant differences in the dimensional and surface accuracy with an optimum outcome offered by the Simplify3D as best 3D slicer tool. The Simplify3D slicer has essential advantages in printed end-use parts because creates the 3D models with significantly better accuracy and quality support.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Šljivic, M., Pavlovic, A., Kraišnik, M., & Ilić, J. (2019). Comparing the accuracy of 3D slicer software in printed enduse parts. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 659). Institute of Physics Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/659/1/012082

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free