Handling ‘Poison Books’: Dry Versus Wet Scenarios

0Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Toxic heavy metal pigments are known to be found in nineteenth-century, mass-produced, Euro-American bookbindings. A lack of data, standards, and regulations for exposure to heavy metal pigments in the cultural heritage sector limits understanding of when such bookbindings might present the greatest health and safety risk and how best to assess such risk. This case study measures the friability of arsenic, chromium, and lead based pigments in a sampling of nineteenth-century bookbindings through three scenarios: first, in their naturally aged, intact state; second, during a water event simulation; and third, after salvage and air-drying from the water disaster simulation. The data demonstrate that the risk of exposure to these heavy metals increases during and after a water event, with exposure to arsenic presenting the highest degree of risk.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tedone, M., Grayburn, R., & Wittine, J. (2025). Handling ‘Poison Books’: Dry Versus Wet Scenarios. Studies in Conservation. Taylor and Francis Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393630.2024.2448394

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free