Abstract
Background International guidelines advocate depression screening in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) and other chronic illnesses, but evidence is lacking. Aims To test the differential efficacy of written patient-targeted feedback v. no written patient feedback after depression screening. Method Patients with CHD or hypertension from three cardiology settings were randomised and screened for depression (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01879111). Compared with the control group, where only cardiologists received written feedback, in the intervention group both cardiologists and patients received written feedback regarding depression status. Depression severity was measured 1 month (primary outcome) and 6 months after screening. Results The control group (n = 220) and the patient-feedback group (n = 155) did not differ in depression severity 1 month after screening. Six months after screening, the patient-feedback group showed significantly greater improvements in depression severity and was twice as likely to seek information about depression compared with the control group. Conclusions Patient-targeted feedback in addition to screening has a significant but small effect on depression severity after 6 months and may encourage patients to take an active role in the self-management of depression.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Löwe, B., Blankenberg, S., Wegscheider, K., König, H. H., Walter, D., Murray, A. M., … Kohlmann, S. (2017). Depression screening with patient-targeted feedback in cardiology: DEPSCREEN-INFO randomised clinical trial. British Journal of Psychiatry, 210(2), 132–139. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.116.184168
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.