The False Promise of Multi-stakeholder Governance: Depoliticising Private Military and Security Companies

5Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSIs) have become a vital part of the global regulatory agenda. For some, MSIs are a way to reassert democratic control and accountability over corporations. For others, they merely represent the private capture of regulatory power. Based on an analysis of three MSIs in an issue area where the prospects for politicisation seem particularly promising, the regulation of Private Military and Security Companies (PMSCs), this article engages the debate about the political dynamics of MSIs. Using a three-face approach to depoliticisation that embraces its governmental, societal and discursive dimensions, the article shows that these governance arrangements have fostered depoliticisation along all three dimensions: The launch of MSIs has not only enabled states to evade a binding licencing regime; they have also diverted NGO attention into more amicable venues and turned the privatisation of security from a normative into a narrow, technical issue.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Prem, B. (2020). The False Promise of Multi-stakeholder Governance: Depoliticising Private Military and Security Companies. Global Society, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2020.1791055

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free