Comparing the levels of frustration between an eye-tracker and a mouse: A pilot study

1Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper tries to identify increases in user frustration when using Eye-Tracking devices as compared to common interfacing devices like a standard mouse. For this, we used an electroencephalograph (EEG) to measure frustration levels while users navigated within a maze using each of the referred devices. Results from the analysis performed on the EEG data indicate that Eye-tracking has the same amount of frustration as a standard mouse for common mouse tracking tasks. In addition, a correlation between the user's reported frustration and the extracted EEG data could not be found rendering the above result virtually invalid. The users' self-reported frustration lends support to our hypothesis but it still is not statistically significant and hence does not confirm the hypothesis. © 2013 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Noronha, H., Sol, R., & Vourvopoulos, A. (2013). Comparing the levels of frustration between an eye-tracker and a mouse: A pilot study. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 7946 LNCS, pp. 107–121). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39062-3_7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free