Evaluating urban agriculture program effectiveness using CIPP model: a review

4Citations
Citations of this article
77Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The art of planting, preparing, and distributing food around urban areas is known as urban agriculture, farming, or gardening. Individuals and organizations generally work in urban agriculture for general purposes: 1) enhancing their own health and economic circumstances; 2) improving their communities’ access to nutritious food; 3) enhancing their community wellbeing; and 4) developing a community and ecosystem. The Urban Agriculture Program (UAP) has been set up by the Department of Agriculture (DOA) Malaysia since 2014 to facilitate and transfer information regarding urban farming practices to the community. However, the program was less effective and had a low success rate due to the local community's minimal participation, slow development, and sustainability of the agriculture community gardens. This article primarily examines the UAP implementation based on the four components of the CIPP Evaluation Model: Context, Input, Process, and Product. The UAP is a sustainable development tool that can provide food or related services within or on the edges of urban areas. Malaysia addresses food security by providing urban dwellers with adequate nutritious, safe, acceptable, and cost-effective food. Therefore, the study is relevant as achieving food security and nutrition that has been set in the urban agriculture program outcome by 2025.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Amira Yusuf, M. S., Man, N., Mohamed Haris, N. B., Ismail, I. A., & Maruf, A. (2021). Evaluating urban agriculture program effectiveness using CIPP model: a review. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 306). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202130603007

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free