Rules for Establishing Causation in Opiate/Opioid Overdose Prosecutions — The Burrage Decision

2Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

As the opiate/opioid crisis has worsened in the United States, one of the law enforcement responses has involved increased efforts to prosecute the individuals responsible for the distribution of illicit drugs that result in overdoses. When mixed intoxications occur, the controlling decision for prosecution is Burrage v. United States (2014), which provides guidance on the types of evidence required for establishment of causation. In many types of legal proceedings, forensic pathologists are called to provide expert testimony, although they may be unaware of the burden of proof that is required in a given case. This paper seeks to elaborate upon the burden of proof in drug overdose prosecutions with the guidance of Burrage and offer insight into the expectations and limitations involved in these cases.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gilson, T. P., Rendon, C., & Pinjuh, J. (2017, March 1). Rules for Establishing Causation in Opiate/Opioid Overdose Prosecutions — The Burrage Decision. Academic Forensic Pathology. SAGE Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.23907/2017.010

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free