Office-Based Weight Loss Counseling Is Ineffective in Liver Transplant Recipients

20Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Weight gain after liver transplantation (LT) is a predictor of major morbidity and mortality post-LT; however, there are no data regarding weight loss following LT. The current study evaluates the effectiveness of standard lifestyle intervention in LT recipients. Methods: All adult LT recipients with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m2 who followed up in post-LT clinic from January 2013 to January 2016 were given standard lifestyle advice based on societal recommendations which was reinforced at 24 weeks. Patients were followed for a total of 48 weeks to assess the impact of such advice on weight. Primary outcome was achieving weight loss ≥ 5% of the body weight after 48 weeks of follow-up. Results: A total of 151 patients with 86 (56.0%) overweight and 65 (44.0%) obese patients were enrolled in the study. The mean BMI at baseline increased from 30.2 ± 3.7 to 30.9 ± 4.3 kg/m2 at 48-week follow-up (p = 0.001). Over the course of study, 58 (38.4%) patients lost any weight and weight loss greater than 5% and 10% occurred in only 18 (11.9%) and 8 (5.3%) of the entire cohort, respectively. Higher level of education was associated with increased likelihood of weight loss (OR 9.8, 95% CI 2.6, 36.9, p = 0.001), while nonalcoholic steatohepatitis as etiology of liver disease (HR 3.7, 95% CI 1.4, 9.7, p = 0.007) was associated with weight gain. Conclusion: The practice of office-based lifestyle intervention is ineffective in achieving clinically significant weight loss in LT recipients, and additional strategies are required to mitigate post-LT weight gain.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Patel, S. S., Siddiqui, M. B., Chadrakumaran, A., Faridnia, M., Lin, F. P., Hernandez Roman, J., … Siddiqui, M. S. (2020). Office-Based Weight Loss Counseling Is Ineffective in Liver Transplant Recipients. Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 65(2), 639–646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-019-05800-6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free