This essay discusses the contributions of post-colonial studies for renewing the contemporary social theory. At first it considers the character of the critique addressed by post-colonial studies to social sciences. After that, it analyses the post-colonial epistemological alternatives, considering three interrelated concepts: entangled modernity, "hybrid" site of enunciation, and decentralized subject. The conclusion is that, in spite of its severity and suspicion among some authors that post-colonial theory can destroy epistemological foundations of social sciences, an important part of post-colonial critique is rather addressed to the theory of modernization. Here, post-colonial positions present affinities with objections, which have already been presented by "conventional" social scientists. Other aspects raised by post-colonial authors do not destabilize, necessarily, social sciences; they can even enrich them. © 2006 ANPOCS.
CITATION STYLE
Costa, S. (2006). Desprovincializando a sociologia: A contribuição pós-colonial. Revista Brasileira de Ciencias Sociais, 21(60), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-69092006000100007
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.