Can computed tomography perfusion predict treatment response after prostate artery embolization: A feasibility study

5Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Prostate artery embolization (PAE) is an emerging therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Optimal patient selection is an important step when introducing new treatments and several characteristics associated with a good clinical outcome has previously been proposed. However, no prognostic tool is yet available for PAE. Computed tomography perfusion is an imaging technique that provides hemodynamic parameters making it possible to estimate the prostatic blood flow (PBF). This study investigated the relationship between PBF and the response to PAE. A post hoc analysis including prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurements before and 24-h after embolization from two prospective studies on sixteen patients undergoing PAE with BPH or prostate cancer were performed. The primary outcome was the correlation between baseline PBF and the change in PSA as a surrogate measure of treatment response. Prostate volume strongly correlated with treatment response and the response was greater with incremental amounts of injected embolic material. PBF was not associated with elevation in PSA and added no information that could guide patient selection.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Malling, B., Røder, M. A., Lauridsen, C., & Lönn, L. (2020). Can computed tomography perfusion predict treatment response after prostate artery embolization: A feasibility study. Diagnostics, 10(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10050304

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free