Why External Witnesses Report Organizational Misconduct to Inspectorates: A Comparative Case Study in Three Inspectorates

7Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Inspectorates and enforcement agencies increasingly depend on information from societal actors to detect and enforce business offenses, but little is known about the factors underlying external reporting. This paper aims to contribute to a better understanding of what drives external reporters to report offenses to enforcement agencies, and how reporters experience the reporting process. Potential reasons to report are derived of the literature on whistleblowing and on business relations within organizational fields. The article then presents findings of an extensive comparative, qualitative empirical study on reporting businesses. We find that reporters aim to incapacitate competitors who gain economic advantage by bending the rules, and regard inspectorates as their ally in maintaining a level playing field.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

van Erp, J., & Loyens, K. (2020). Why External Witnesses Report Organizational Misconduct to Inspectorates: A Comparative Case Study in Three Inspectorates. Administration and Society, 52(2), 265–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399718787771

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free