Challenges in evaluating clinical governance systems in Iran: A qualitative study

9Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: In spite of the pivotal role of clinical governance in enhancing quality of services provided by hospitals across the country, a scientific framework with specific criteria for evaluating hospitals has not been developed so far. Objectives: This study was conducted with the aim to identify the challenges involved in evaluating systems of clinical governance in Iran. Materials and Methods: For the purposes of this qualitative study, 15 semi-structured interviews with experts in the field were conducted in 2011 and the data were analyzed using framework analysis method. Results: Five major challenges in evaluating clinical governance include managing human resources, improving clinical quality, managing development, organizing clinical governance, and providing patient-oriented healthcare system. Conclusions: Healthcare system in Iran requires a clinical governance program which has a patient-oriented approach in philosophy, operation, and effectiveness in order to meet the challenges ahead. © 2014, Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal; Published by Kowsar Corp.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hooshmand, E., Tourani, S., Ravaghi, H., & Ebrahimipour, H. (2014). Challenges in evaluating clinical governance systems in Iran: A qualitative study. Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.5812/ircmj.13421

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free