Body mass index and waist circumference: Association with cardiovascular risk factors

61Citations
Citations of this article
149Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the association between cardiovascular risk factors and the anthropometric values - body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC). Methods: It was studied 231 employees of Federal University of Viçosa, Brazil, 54,1% of them were men (21-76 years old) were measured. Glycemia, total cholesterol, LDL, HDL, triglycerides, blood pressure, BMI, WC, waist-to-hip ratio and body fatness. It was also investigated smoking, alcohol consumption and physical activity. Results: The prevalence of overweight/obesity in this population was high mainly in women. The abdominal obesity was observed in 74% of the women and 46,1% of the men. The average of BMI, body fatness, total cholesterol, HDL and triglycerides were significantly higher in men than in women. (p < 0,05). The sedentary lifestyle was a risk factor for obesity. Smoking and alcohol consumption were more common among men and normal weight volunteers. Most of the correlations between anthropometric indices and risk factors for cardiovascular diseases were significant, but weak and the WC was the index that had the strongest correlation and that associated with the largest number of variables. It was observed that with an increase of the BMI and the abdominal fat, there was also an increase of the glycemia, triglycerides and blood pressure and a decrease of HDL. The metabolic syndrome was more common among men and overweight and obese volunteers. Conclusion: In this study, the frequency of cardiovascular risk factors increased along with BMI and WC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rezende, F. A. C., Rosado, L. E. F. P. L., Ribeiro, R. D. C. L., Vidigal, F. D. C., Vasques, A. C. J., Bonard, I. S., & De Carvalho, C. R. (2006). Body mass index and waist circumference: Association with cardiovascular risk factors. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, 87(6), 666–671. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0066-782X2006001900008

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free