Dilemmas in measuring and using pressure ulcer prevalence and incidence: An international consensus

94Citations
Citations of this article
87Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Pressure ulcer prevalence and incidence data are increasingly being used as indicators of quality of care and the efficacy of pressure ulcer prevention protocols. In some health care systems, the occurrence of pressure ulcers is also being linked to reimbursement. The wider use of these epidemiological analyses necessitates that all those involved in pressure ulcer care and prevention have a clear understanding of the definitions and implications of prevalence and incidence rates. In addition, an appreciation of the potential difficulties in conducting prevalence and incidence studies and the possible explanations for differences between studies are important. An international group of experts has worked to produce a consensus document that aims to delineate and discuss the important issues involved, and to provide guidance on approaches to conducting and interpreting pressure ulcer prevalence and incidence studies. The group's main findings are summarised in this paper. © 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd and Medicalhelplines.com Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Baharestani, M. M., Black, J. M., Carville, K., Clark, M., Cuddigan, J. E., Dealey, C., … Sanada, H. (2009). Dilemmas in measuring and using pressure ulcer prevalence and incidence: An international consensus. International Wound Journal, 6(2), 97–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-481X.2009.00593.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free