Pooling of interdigital swab samples for PCR detection of virulent Dichelobacter nodosus

13Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Virulent ovine foot rot is a contagious foot disease. Given the development and validation of a real-time PCR to detect Dichelobacter nodosus isolates that contain the virulence-associated protease genes aprV2 and aprB2, the diagnosis of foot rot has made considerable progress. We evaluated pooling methods to reduce the number of samples during a foot rot control program. Samples of individual feet were compared to a 4-feet sample of the same sheep. All further analyses based on 4-feet samples (pools-of-5 and pools-of-10 4-feet samples) were compared to samples of individual sheep, and a risk-based herd sampling was evaluated and compared to the whole flock. The sensitivity and specificity of the 4-feet samples for detection of aprV2-positive strains was 93.8% (CI: 87.6–97.5%) and 98.3% (CI: 96.5–99.3%), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the pools-of-10 was 86.7% (CI: 78.4–92.7%) and 100.0% (CI: 97.4–100%), respectively. Pools-of-5 were not significantly more sensitive than pools-of-10. The pooling of 4 individual foot samples into one 4-feet sample is an adequate method to reduce the number of samples of individual sheep. The sensitivity of pools-of-5 and pools-of-10 is too imprecise for a control program. Risk-based sampling allowed for a substantial reduction of samples to be tested, had a sensitivity of 95.8% (CI: 78.9–99.9%) and specificity of 100.0% (CI: 88.1–100.0%) when determining the foot rot flock status, and represents an adequate methodology to predict within-flock freedom from infection.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Greber, D., Locher, I., Kuhnert, P., Butty, M. A., Holdener, K., Frey, J., … Steiner, A. (2018). Pooling of interdigital swab samples for PCR detection of virulent Dichelobacter nodosus. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, 30(2), 205–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/1040638717733508

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free