Internalised deficit perspectives: positionality in culturally responsive pedagogical frameworks

7Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

By showing that deficit thinking can manifest in an internalised sense among historically minoritised students, this paper examines the significance of ‘positionality’ in (re)conceptualising culturally responsive pedagogies (CRPs). Drawing from a study that explored the lived experiences of students participating in a culturally and linguistically diverse context, I demonstrate that whilst some students’ dispositions towards their home cultures and languages align with the anti-deficit and anti-racist agendas of CRPs, some dispositions present a counter-narrative and can be supportive of the status quo. I refer to these dispositions as ‘internalised deficit thinking or perspectives’. To capture this concept and, in a more general sense, the diverse subjectivities students used to navigate Westernised schooling arrangements, this paper advances the notion of positionality. Bringing ‘positionality’ into conversation with CRPs means confronting the relations of power, embodied by students of diverse backgrounds, in fostering socially just educational experiences.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cabiles, B. S. (2025). Internalised deficit perspectives: positionality in culturally responsive pedagogical frameworks. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 33(4), 1129–1146. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2024.2326004

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free