Team-based Learning Impact: A Comparative Study of Student and Faculty Facilitators

0Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Team-based learning (TBL) refers to the application of an active-learning method that has gained popularity across all health-care disciplines. This study aimed to assess nutrition students’ perceptions of the roles of student versus faculty facilitators. Methods: Participants in the study included, 117 2nd-year nutrition students registered in the “Introduction to Medicine” course in the 2022 academic year at a Japanese university. The first TBL session was faculty-led, whereas three students served as facilitators in the second. Upon completion of the course, learners and student facilitators completed a questionnaire on the student-led TBL. Responses to close-ended questions were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and those to open-ended questions were categorized into common themes. Results: A total of 114 learners and 3 student facilitators responded to the questions. Learners found student-led TBL to be just as or more effective than faculty-led TBL in three respects: comprehension (93.0%), active participation (96.5%), and expectation of academic performance improvement (93.9%). According to student facilitators, it improved their knowledge, confidence, communication skills, and leadership abilities. Learners and facilitators indicated that student-led TBL was significantly more effective than faculty-led TBL. Thus, student-led TBL can enhance the ability of all students at different academic levels. Discussion: Student-led TBL appears to be an effective learning strategy in higher education and further shifts toward student-centered learning in the course curriculum.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Iida, R., Tanaka, M., Torigoe, M., Inaba, S., Wakana, N., Homma, K., & Fukuyama, N. (2023). Team-based Learning Impact: A Comparative Study of Student and Faculty Facilitators. Education for Health: Change in Learning and Practice, 36(3), 143–146. https://doi.org/10.4103/efh.efh_191_23

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free