Careful reading versus expeditious reading: Investigating the construct validity of a multiple-choice reading test

7Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The paper investigates the validity of a multiple-choice reading test using Weir and Khalifa's (2008) model of reading. Fifty (50) multiple-choice reading items taken from the 2011 English state examination were administered to 496 Grade 12 secondary school students. A concurrent strategies questionnaire was used to elicit information on participants' use of strategies during test writing. The results indicate that there are more items that target careful reading than those that target expeditious reading. This is to suggest that the ESE tasks appear to be inappropriate and may need some modifications to more closely reflect the actual test context. © 2013 ACADEMY PUBLISHER Manufactured in Finland.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Katalayi, G. B., & Sivasubramaniam, S. (2013). Careful reading versus expeditious reading: Investigating the construct validity of a multiple-choice reading test. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(6), 877–884. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.6.877-884

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free