Electoral institutions and management of elections in Nigeria and Ghana: A comparative assessment

  • Lukman O
  • Abdulrauf A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Since the arrival of new democratic train in West Africa, elections have been characterized with naked violence and irregularities which have negatively manifested in economic underdevelopment and political instability. To this end, understanding the dominant nature and character of the electoral management bodies of Nigeria and Ghana to identify a body that is substantially functioning well is central to this paper. This study found a more stronger INEC in terms of electoral management comparing the previous elections with 2015 general elections, yet issues such as non-permanent position of her experienced principal officers, nature of funding, ineffective working relation with other stakeholders are still challenges. This paper discovered that a substantial level of autonomy, permanency in membership of Ghanaian Electoral Commission (EC), proper funding and a doctrine of Inter Party Advisory Committee significantly contributed to its electoral success; by extension democratic consolidation. This study was of the view that Nigeria stands to distinguish itself, if it meticulously adopts and adapts Ghana's viable electoral model.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lukman, O. A., & Abdulrauf, A. (2021). Electoral institutions and management of elections in Nigeria and Ghana: A comparative assessment. African Journal of Political Science and International Relations, 15(2), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.5897/ajpsir2020.1288

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free