Four-year follow-up of surgical versus non-surgical therapy for chronic low back pain

114Citations
Citations of this article
306Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the long-term effectiveness of surgical and non-surgical treatment in patients with chronic low back pain. Methods: Two merged randomised clinical trials compared instrumented transpedicular fusion with cognitive intervention and exercises in 124 patients with disc degeneration and at least 1 year of symptoms after or without previous surgery for disc herniation. The main outcome measure was the Oswestry disability index. Results: At 4 years 14 (24%) patients randomly assigned to cognitive intervention and exercises had also undergone surgery. 15 (23%) patients assigned fusion had undergone re-surgery. The mean treatment effect for the primary outcome was 1.1; 95% CI -5.9 to 8.2, according to the intention-to-treat analysis and -1.6; 95% CI -8.9 to 5.6 in the as-treated analysis. There was no difference in return to work. Conclusions: Long-term improvement was not better after instrumented transpedicular fusion compared with cognitive intervention and exercises.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brox, J. I., Nygaard, Ø. P., Holm, I., Keller, A., Ingebrigtsen, T., & Reikerås, O. (2010). Four-year follow-up of surgical versus non-surgical therapy for chronic low back pain. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 69(9), 1643–1648. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2009.108902

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free