Trait Emotional Intelligence in Childhood: Factorial Structure of the TEIQue–Child Form (CF) and Child Short Form (CSF)

0Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This research examined the component structure of two child measures, the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire–Child Form (TEIQue-CF; 75 items) and its short form (TEIQue-CSF; 36 items), developed specifically for children aged 8 to 12 years. Study 1 analysed TEIQue-CF data using the nine facet scores from 720 UK primary school pupils in Years 3 through 6 using principal component analysis with parallel analysis for factor retention. Results supported a unifactorial solution in the total sample, with a single factor explaining 43.48% of the variance. Exploratory subgroup factor analyses (in boys and older children in Years 5 to 6) in Study 1 suggested a potentially interpretable bifactorial pattern, though parallel analysis did not support retaining the second factor. Study 2 examined the TEIQue-CSF in 1582 Year 6 pupils using parcel-level analysis. A clearer two-factor structure emerged, with Socioemotionality (Adaptability, Peer relations, Self-esteem, Emotion expression, Affective disposition, Emotion perception) and Emotion control (Impulse control, Emotion regulation, Self-motivation) explaining 53.7% of the variance. This structure replicated across gender subgroups. Taken together, the findings suggest a developmental trend in which trait EI shifts from a largely undifferentiated structure in middle childhood to a more differentiated two-factor organisation by the end of primary school. They support the use of global trait EI scores in younger children while indicating that differentiated assessment becomes appropriate as children approach adolescence.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mavroveli, S., Petrides, K. V., & Sanchez-Ruiz, M. J. (2026). Trait Emotional Intelligence in Childhood: Factorial Structure of the TEIQue–Child Form (CF) and Child Short Form (CSF). Behavioral Sciences, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16040501

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free