Development of clinical trials in a cooperative group setting: The eastern cooperative oncology group

46Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: We examine the processes and document the calendar time required to activate phase II and III clinical trials by an oncology group: the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG). Methods: Setup steps were documented by (a) interviewing ECOG headquarters and statistical center staff, and committee chairs, (b) reviewing standard operating procedure manuals, and (c) inspecting study records, documents, and e-mails to identify additional steps. Calendar time was collected for each major process for each study in this set. Results: Twenty-eight phase III studies were activated by ECOG during the January 2000 to July 2006 study period. We examined a sample from 16 of those studies in detail. More than 481 distinct processes were required for study activation: 420 working steps, 61 major decision points, 26 processing loops, and 13 stopping points. Median calendar days to activate a trial in the phase III subset was 783 days (range, 285-1,542 days) from executive approval and 808 days (range, 435-1,604 days) from initial conception of the study. Data were collected for all phase II and phase III trials activated and completed during this time period [n = 52) for which development time represented 43.9% and 54.1% of the total trial time, respectively. Conclusion: The steps required to develop and activate a clinical trial may require as much or more time than the actual completion of a trial. The data shows that to improve the activation process, research should to be directed toward streamlining both internal and external groups and processes. © 2008 American Association for Cancer Research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dilts, D. M., Sandler, A., Cheng, S., Crites, J., Ferranti, L., Wu, A., … Comis, R. (2008). Development of clinical trials in a cooperative group setting: The eastern cooperative oncology group. Clinical Cancer Research, 14(11), 3427–3433. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-5060

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free